I’m Applying For A Job | I Want to be Your Home Schooler

fx

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania – December 27 –
The greatest threat to the United States, as we have known it, is President Obama. He is not a conservative capitalist. He is capable of declaring marshal law. He has been instrumental in destroying liberty in the United States, and he has signed a law, which denies the right to a trial.
If marshal law is declared, there will be no constitutional rights. There will be no legal requirements for an election in 2012.
The question that remains is: If, and when, he will make a move, and how the citizens will react.
If President Obama declares marshal law prior to the 2012 election, how will you react? Will you join the side of the citizens, or will you support the side of the government?
I’m adding a few additional words, because I’m applying for a job as an examiner. So, not only do I want to be your home schooler, I want to be your examiner.

Newsvine Seed | Upon Release of Martial Law Documents, The Plan For America's Destruction Becomes Apparent

fx

Some rights reserved by Dave3422

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania   December 26, 2011  

Read Article

The seeder of this article on Newsvine appears to be a liberal. I recognize many of her friends as liberals. Apparently liberals are realizing that their own President, Democrats, US government, et cetera are not their friends, but that their goal is in fact to harm liberals. Otherwise, why would she seed this article?

 An Obama supporter is heard in a video saying in effect, I voted for Obama, but I’m not sure I can back him. It’s no longer liberals against everyone, it’s government against citizens. The liberals are caught in a trap. The trap is: Their own liberals have turned, and are turning on the liberals as citizens.

The day will come when the traitors in Washington, led by President Obama, will issue orders to the military and police to fire on Americans and enforce Martial Law. At that point, even the most blind and ignorant people will probably come to the obvious conclusion that it is not Al-Qaeda who desires the destruction of America, but the hijacked and treasonous U.S. government.

Their own liberals are engaging in a plot to use military force to detain citizens indefinitely without trial.

My sense is that the momentum to declare marshal law is accelerating.

Your attention is needed.

Handel’s Messiah

k

The Savior is Born

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania – December 25 –
The boundaries of the universe have not been found. We are in infinite space.

 
Christy Sandhoff originally shared this post:

 
(My comments on the info below. You can argue, debate, philosophize, etc. all you want. But the bottom line is this.... you either believe or you don't.....you either have faith or you don't....if the Atheist is right the Christian has lost nothing living their life in faith, but if the Christian is right the Atheist has lost everything.)
A surprising ending.... this is absolutely worth the read!
"Let me explain the problem science has with religion." The atheist professor of philosophy pauses before his class and then asks one of his new students to stand.
"You're a Christian, aren't you, son?"
"Yes sir," the student says
"So you believe in God?"
"Absolutely."
"Is God good?"
"Sure! God's good."
"Is God all-powerful? Can God do anything?"
"Yes."
"Are you good or evil?"
"The Bible says I'm evil.
The professor grins knowingly. "Aha! The Bible! He considers for a moment. "Here's one for you. Let's say there's a sick person over here, and you can cure him. You can do it. Would you help him? Would you try?"
"Yes sir, I would."
"So you're good...!"
"I wouldn't say that."
"But why not say that? You'd help a sick and maimed person if you could. Most of us would if we could. But God doesn't."
The student does not answer, so the professor continues. "He doesn't, does he? My brother was a Christian who died of cancer, even though he prayed to Jesus to heal him. How is this Jesus good? Can you answer that one?"
The student remains silent. "No, you can't, can you?" the professor says.
He takes a sip of water from a glass on his desk to give the student time to relax. "Let's start again, young fella. Is God good?"
"Er..yes," the student says.
"Is Satan good?"
The student doesn't hesitate on this one. "No."
"Then where does Satan come from?"
The student falters. "From God."
"That's right. God made Satan, didn't he? Tell me, son. Is there evil in this world?"
"Yes, sir..."
"Evil's everywhere, isn't it? And God did make everything, correct?"
"Yes."
"So who created evil?" The professor continued, "If God created everything, then God created evil, since evil exists, and according to the principle that our works define who we are, then God is evil."
Again, the student has no answer. "Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred? Ugliness? All these terrible things, do they exist in this world?"
The student squirms on his feet. "Yes."
"So who created them?"
The student does not answer again, so the professor repeats his question. "Who created them?" There is still no answer.
Suddenly the lecturer breaks away to pace in front of the classroom. The class is mesmerized. "Tell me," he continues onto another student. "Do you believe in Jesus Christ, son?"
The student's voice betrays him and cracks. "Yes, professor, I do."
The old man stops pacing. "Science says you have five senses you use to identify and observe the world around you. Have you ever seen Jesus?"
"No sir. I've never seen Him."
"Then tell us if you've ever heard your Jesus?"
"No, sir, I have not..."
"Have you ever felt your Jesus, tasted your Jesus or smelt your Jesus? Have you ever had any sensory perception of Jesus Christ, or God for that matter?"
"No, sir, I'm afraid I haven't."
"Yet you still believe in him?"
"Yes."
"According to the rules of empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, science says your God doesn't exist... What do you say to that, son?"
"Nothing," the student replies... "I only have my faith."
"Yes, faith," the professor repeats. "And that is the problem science has with God. There is no evidence, only faith."
The student stands quietly for a moment, before asking a question of his own. "Professor, is there such thing as heat?"
"Yes."
"And is there such a thing as cold?"
"Yes, son, there's cold too."
"No sir, there isn't."
The professor turns to face the student, obviously interested. The room suddenly becomes very quiet. The student begins to explain. "You can have lots of heat, even more heat, super-heat, mega-heat, unlimited heat, white heat, a little heat or no heat, but we don't have anything called 'cold.' We can hit down to 458 degrees below zero, which is no heat, but we can't go any further after that.
"There is no such thing as cold; otherwise we would be able to go colder than the lowest -458 degrees. Every body or object is susceptible to study when it has or transmits energy, and heat is what makes a body or matter have or transmit energy. Absolute zero (-458 F) is the total absence of heat. You see, sir, cold is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold. Heat we can measure in thermal units because heat is energy. Cold is not the opposite of heat, sir, just the absence of it."
Silence across the room. A pen drops somewhere in the classroom, sounding like a hammer.
"What about darkness, professor. Is there such a thing as darkness?"
"Yes," the professor replies without hesitation. "What is night if it isn't darkness?"
"You're wrong again, sir. Darkness is not something; it is the absence of something. You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing light, but if you have no light constantly you have nothing and it's called darkness, isn't it? That's the meaning we use to define the word. In reality, darkness isn't. If it were, you would be able to make darkness darker, wouldn't you?"
The professor begins to smile at the student in front of him. This will be a good semester. "So what point are you making, young man?"
"Yes, professor. My point is, your philosophical premise is flawed to start with, and so your conclusion must also be flawed."
The professor's face cannot hide his surprise this time. "Flawed? Can you explain how?"
"You are working on the premise of duality," the student explains. "You argue that there is life and then there's death; a good God and a bad God. You are viewing the concept of God as something finite, something we can measure. Sir, science can't even explain a thought. It uses electricity and magnetism, but has never seen, much less fully understood, either one. To view death as the opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that death cannot exist as a substantive thing. Death is not the opposite of life, just the absence of it.
"Now tell me, professor... Do you teach your students that they evolved from a monkey?"
"If you are referring to the natural evolutionary process, young man, yes, of course I do."
"Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes, sir?"
The professor begins to shake his head, still smiling, as he realizes where the argument is going. A very good semester, indeed.
"Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this process is an on-going endeavor, are you not teaching your opinion, sir? Are you now not a scientist, but a preacher?"
The class is in uproar. The student remains silent until the commotion has subsided. "To continue the point you were making earlier to the other student, let me give you an example of what I mean." The student looks around the room. "Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the professor's brain?" The class breaks out into laughter. "Is there anyone here who has ever heard the professor's brain, felt the professor's brain, touched or smelt the professor's brain? No one appears to have done so. So, according to the established rules of empirical, stable, demonstrable protocol, science says that you have no brain, with all due respect, sir. So if science says you have no brain, how can we trust your lectures, sir?"
Now the room is silent. The professor just stares at the student, his face unreadable. Finally, after what seems an eternity, the old man answers. "I guess you'll have to take them on faith."
"Now, you accept that there is faith, and, in fact, faith exists with life," the student continues. "Now, sir, is there such a thing as evil?" Now uncertain, the professor responds, "Of course, there is. We see it every day. It is in the daily example of man's inhumanity to man. It is in the multitude of crime and violence everywhere in the world. These manifestations are nothing else but evil."
To this the student replied, "Evil does not exist sir, or at least it does not exist unto itself. Evil is simply the absence of God. It is just like darkness and cold, a word that man has created to describe the absence of God. God did not create evil. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God's love present in his heart. It's like the cold that comes when there is no heat or the darkness that comes when there is no light."
"The professor sat down.
The student was Albert Einstein who wrote a book titled God vs. Science in 1921. [1]

[1] I tried to find the book. I’m pretty sure it doesn’t exist.
I sang Handel’s Messiah in a choir at a Concordia High School event in Fort Wayne, Indiana. There were several adolescent boys, whose voices had not changed, in that choir. I was one of them. Concordia was a boarding school, and I lived in a dormitory.

December 7, 1941 Pearl Harbor | December 16, 2011

fx

♫ God Bless The USA
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania – December 25, 2011 –
December 7, !941 will live in infamy. Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, and a sleeping giant awakened.
December 16, 2011 will live in infamy. Liberty and the right to a trial were removed by law.

Merry Christmas everyone!

Remote Start

fx

Click to Enlarge

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania – December 22 –
We bought a new Dodge Journey a couple weeks ago, and I made arrangements to have a remote start feature installed on it. I wanted to surprise my wife with a Christmas present. The saleslady, Amanda, made arrangements to have the parts ordered, and she advised me yesterday that the parts were here, ready to be installed. I told my wife about the whole thing last night, and told her that we would have to take the car in today to have the remote start feature installed. She was a little shocked, and seemed concerned about how much it was going to cost.
I’m hoping the cost will be in the $500 range, but will just have to wait and see what happens.
My wife did say a few days ago, that she wished we had a remote start for the car.
I hope that she will be pleased with her Christmas present. I normally don’t buy presents for her, because she would rather buy her own stuff, and over the years, she has been right. I bought several coats, some jewelry, and other things, which she really didn’t like too much.
Hopefully this time will be the charm.

Merry Christmas everyone!

I Don’t Have to Define Marxism | To Write About Marxist President Obama

fx

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania – December 19 –

I have been asked numerous times to define what I believe Marxism is. I have not complied, because what I believe Marxism is, is immaterial. Everyone knows what Cuba is. If you want a definition of Communism, there it is; Cuba.

I have said the President Obama is a Marxist. What I have said about President Obama is not false. President Obama told Joe the plumber, I want to spread the wealth around. Spreading the wealth around is also called redistribution of wealth. Tax the rich is redistribution of wealth. Take from the rich, tax the upper 1%.

That’s wealth redistribution. Chou Chou, my dear friend, made a comment, which presents the flip side of wealth redistribution:

chouchou
Anthony #3.9
On the note of equality:
History has shown that equality of results is completely impractical. The only thing that equality of results has accomplished where it has been implemented is to spread poverty and famine. It has never raised the living standards of those it claimed to benefit, but has only lowered them. As has been noted by many ' capitalism is the uneven distribution of wealth, and socialism the even distribution of poverty.
In sum, egalitarianism, concept of Marx, the holy grail of socialism, leads to mediocrity.
"Conservatives divide the world in terms of good and evil while liberals do it in terms of the rich and poor.” ---Dennis Prager.
Wealth redistribution is a major tenet of Marxism. There is no unequal distribution of wealth in Cuba.
President Obama appointed Van Jones as a czar. Van Jones is the poster child of the even distribution of poverty. Van Jones is a friend and supporter of Occupy Wall Street. President Obama is on a friendly basis with Van Jones to this day.
President Obama recently stated, “Families like yours, young people like the ones here today — including the ones who were just chanting at me — [1] you’re the reason that I ran for office in the first place.” Occupy Wall Street opposes unequal distribution of wealth. Occupy Wall street supports “spreading the wealth around”. President Obama supports “spreading the wealth around”.
These are relatively recent examples of President Obama’s Marxism.
President Obama has displayed his affinity to Marxism for decades. He taught an Alinsky workshop for several years in the 1980’s. Alinsky was a closet Communist.
Money was distributed to “community causes under President Obama’s watch at Chicago organizations in the 1980’s and 1990’s.
President Obama put this into print: “To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I choose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists,” Obama in his book “Dreams from my Father”.”
 Our Marxist Wizard of Oz

[1] Occupy Wall Street

The Chickens are Coming Home to Roost

fx

Click to Enlarge

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania – December 18 –

The former NRLB appointee of President Obama is likely to have his butt in a sling.
President Obama may have to allow the pipeline, even though he isn't interested in creating jobs. He's only interested in "green" failures, like Solyndra, which only represent one third of the potential electricity market. A Harvard graduate is too dim to figure that out. We need gas, coal, nuclear, et cetera, power production, but President Obama can't figure that out.